Tuesday, 25 September 2012

Design for Living

This weekend I watched a particularly odious episode of Location Location Location where a northern self-employed dad and his graduate daughter traipsed around London looking for the ideal one-bed flat for her in preparation for starting her first job. It had to be in a certain area, have certain period features, have the light coming in from a certain direction in the mornings and not be too far from the tube station, lest daddy's little darling have too risky a walk home at night. Oh and be under £200k (dad's only stipulation since he was paying), with some decent night life nearby. After an exhaustive search Phil and Kirsty hit upon the ideal flat. Except that it was in Tooting. Kimberley stuck her bottom lip out before being persuaded to revisit the other flats in more desirable areas. Finally she accepted that the others were shoe-box like in proportion compared to the Tooting flat and she must prepare to make what was evidently the first compromise of her young life.

Eventually Phil swung the deal and won a smile from the little madam. Poor daddy got nothing, not even a thank you, let alone a hug and a 'You're the best daddy who ever lived, ever!)

Today I read that parents and grandparents are being encouraged to raid their pension funds to get their offspring onto the property ladder. Well obviously, they weren't going to do anything better with them, just squander them on heating, lighting and food, that sort of frippery. Luckily many pension funds are locked down with tight conditions and huge early release fees to save those parents and grandparents who would be so foolish as to listen to Nick Clegg from themselves. But it's not just about the undeserving Kimberleys of this world who've yet to do an honest days' work and seemingly take familial handouts and free flats for granted. Helping youngsters pay ever more exorbitant prices for ever smaller properties is helping no one and coming generations won't stand a cat in hell's chance of getting anywhere near the bottom rung of the property ladder, let alone on it, even with the family's entire piggybank of savings and pensions heaped upon them. Then there's that pesky student loan to pay back before they can properly start their adult lives. Small wonder that the marriage age and first child age is also rising ever upwards.

With all these factors in mind I ask:
  • Why isn't the government acknowledging that this artificially overheated housing market has to stop and cannot continue indefinitely? 
  • Why isn't the nation going on a house-buying strike to shake the market up?
  • Why aren't buy-to-let house sales/mortgages and second homes being banned? Or at least supertaxed, with that tax being used to subsidise new social housing? 
  • Why isn't more being done to bring the estimated 750,000 existing empty properties back into use? 
  • Where is the rent-capping seen in so many European countries which enables tenants to comfortably afford to rent knowing they have security against unreasonable rent hikes and are not at the mercy of market forces or unscrupulous landlords? 
  • Why are non-UK residents able to buy property in UK or even claim social housing, sometimes above those UK citizens who have been on council waiting lists for many years?
  • Now it's hard to obtain a property for less than £250k in many towns and cities, surely it's time to raise the stamp duty to apply only to properties of £500k+ or discard it altogether?
And why aren't these measures being considered before the more outrageous notions of forcing elderly people out of their family homes, some of which may have been in their family for generations or building on the green belt and allowing unregulated back garden developments? As for the 'mansion tax' on properties of £1m+ proposed, that assumes that somone living in such a house has assets to go with their bricks and mortar. Not always the case. Not only is there much genteel poverty around, but sometimes what started off as a relatively modest family home may have jumped from £30k to £1m in the space of forty or so years purely because of the location of it, not because the house itself is in any way grand or mansion-like.

6 comments:

chris sivewright said...

..and why don't students stay at home and study at the Uni in their home town?

Nota Bene said...

Welcome back...you've been missed! And what a super post...well thought out and carefully written. Many points well made

Steve said...

We're heading back to serfdom, I swear. Property will be the preserve of the rich and the rest of us will be living in caves.

Wisewebwoman said...

The bubble is bursting as I write. Oligarchy is here. I don't know what scraps will be left, Laura.

But a giant confluence of all things unholy is on the borders of our lives.

Hat-tipping reenters.

XO
WWW

Marginalia said...

The trouble is that most of the measures you suggest could cause a collapse of the housing market. You (if you're a home owner) me, the banks, the pension funds and frankly most of the ecomomy would lose.

Housing is vitally important. Too important to be left to politicians, too important to be left to the market and too important to be left to the 65% who own our own property.

If your agenda were to be put into effect it would need a regime that made Stalin and Po Pot seem like the Enlightenment.

That's the depressing truth.

The Poet Laura-eate said...

Chris, I think more students are indeed taking that option these days and choosing their local university as oppose to one halfway across the country.

Thanks for your lovely comments Notabene. BTW I haven't really gone away - just dealing with simultaneous seachanges in my life this year which make regular blogging difficult.

Steve and WWW, I fear it's already happening/we're already there.

Marginella, negative equity is nothing new and sometimes the south sea bubble has to burst in order for reality to return. It is not a housing crash which will bring this country to its knees but the apathy of most of its citizens in not voting and standing up for their rights. The French have the right idea. Their government lives in fear of THEM whereas the reverse is true in England.